Gitter is fine and the public channel I linked to in the original email is fine. It's functionally no different than IRC. The channel just has to be open for any one rather than invite only.
-Jakob On 22 August 2016 at 13:10, Maxime Beauchemin <[email protected]> wrote: > I think Gitter must have just transferred along as we moved the repo. I'm > personally open to using IRC. > > Max > > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:50 PM, Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Also who is the owner of this room? It seems created by Apache so they >> (INFRA?) can set it to public? Logs will be public then by default. >> >> Wasn't there some discussion on a more relaxed requirement of this >> happening on ASF infrastructure? >> >> Bolke. >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> > On 22 aug. 2016, at 20:29, Jakob Homan <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > Hey all- >> > Apparently there is a private channel being used for project >> > discussion on gitter (the archive would be here: >> > https://gitter.im/apache/incubator-airflow/Airflow_ >> committers/archives/all, >> > similar to the public archive of the regular gitter channel: >> > https://gitter.im/apache/incubator-airflow/archives/all), titled >> > "Airflow_committers." >> > >> > As has been discussed before, all non-PMC level ASF communication >> > *has* to be in a public accessible forum (preferably that is archived >> > to an ASF list). Even if well intentioned, these channels are >> > exclusionary and absolutely verboten per ASF. >> > >> > We need to open or shut that channel down and make sure we note this >> > on the next IPMC report... >> > >> > -Jakob >>
