I'm planning on working on a minimal apache release this week. If someone can point to the commit or PRs I can add them to `branch-1.7.2-apache` and start moving towards the release.
Max On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Alex Van Boxel <[email protected]> wrote: > All stuff is in master (I'm running pre-production on master), if it needs > to be cherry-picked to a branch I can always test it. I would be grate if > it's in the next release so I can start blogging about it. > > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 8:05 PM Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> wrote: > > > (Sorry for the late response, I was on holiday) > > > > I think the G* operators just need to be cherry picked. This will make us > > deviate slightly from the > > previous release, but makes sure we don’t have to ‘fix’ history > afterwards. > > > > Anyone against this? > > > > - B. > > > > > Op 8 aug. 2016, om 14:21 heeft Alex Van Boxel <[email protected]> het > > volgende geschreven: > > > > > > Sorry, Bolke. What needs to be done for Google Cloud operators/hooks? > > > > > > If you bring me up-to-speed I can do this. I'm currently working an a > CI > > > setup for the Google stuff). > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 3:56 PM Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > >> I have indeed a branch with cherry picked commits. This branch is > > >> available in the apache repo. The branch is available as > > >> “branch-1.7.2-apache”. What is left to do is to decide weather we do > > >> upgrade the google cloud operators/hooks as part of this release as > the > > >> licenses were only added after these changes came in. I prefer this > > >> approach as we stay away from custom commits as much as possible then. > > >> > > >> - Bolke > > >> > > >>> Op 5 aug. 2016, om 00:21 heeft Gurer Kiratli < > [email protected] > > .INVALID> > > >> het volgende geschreven: > > >>> > > >>> Agenda > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> Committers sync-up: progress and plans > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> Max to do a recap since last release > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> Airbnb > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> Anyone else? > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> Cooperation Best Practices > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> Solicit for feedback for Impersonation Design Review > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> Release Schedule, Management > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> Roadmap discussion > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> Attendees: Jeremiah Lowin, Chris Riccomini, Andrew Phillips(?), > Maxime > > >>> Beauchemin, Paul Yang, Dan Davydov, Xuanji Li, George Ke, Arthur > > Wiedmer, > > >>> Gurer Kiratli > > >>> > > >>> Notes > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> Recap for the overall project > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Max] > > >>> > > >> https://gist.github.com/mistercrunch/5460483ec764e2a1cb816c6b1d6ad5a3 > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> Airbnb Recap > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Paul] Airbnb is continuing work on features related to migrating > > >>> more jobs onto Airflow - DB connection scalability, > impersonation, > > >>> refreshing web UI, DAG git versioning, task resource isolation > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> Other Recaps > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Chris] Improvements to Import functionality. Joy did some work > > >>> around CLIs and mark success in collaboration with Bolke. > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Jeremiah] Came up with the Merge tool. Focusing on the work > around > > >>> configuration. > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> Meeting cadence > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Max] We can have monthly meetings. Let’s start with monthly we > can > > >>> change the cadence. We should invite all contributors. We should > > >>> specify in > > >>> the invite that everyone is welcome. Currently posting this on > > >>> the mailing > > >>> list and wiki. > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> *Action Item* Gurer to schedule monthly meetings next one at > > >> Airbnb. > > >>> Airbnb is welcoming folks to come onsite > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> Blog/Documentation > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Max, Chris, Jeremiah] Having a blog would be useful. We can > > >>> structure our thoughts. > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Andrew] Blog should have better language with screenshots and > all. > > >>> This raises the level of effort bar and this might mean that > > >>> nobody really > > >>> does it. > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Max] Maybe use Medium? We can try it out. > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Max] Haven’t looked at the documentation for a long time. I > don’t > > >>> really know about its quality. > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Arthur] Looking at the email list responses, seems like the > > >>> documentation is missing certain elements. > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Max] Maybe we can interview people who just started and identify > > >>> gaps. > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> *Action Item* [Jeremiah] We can also ask the mailing list about > > >> this. > > >>> He will send this out. > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> Cooperation guidelines > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Max, Arthur] > > >>> > > >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Community+Guidelines > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Chris] Let’s link the guidelines to contributor md . This should > > be > > >>> discoverable > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> Release > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Chris, Max] Bolke might have branch with High charts and > Licensing > > >>> cherry picked. We can use this as a dry run. We can test the > > >> process. > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Max] Big release is probably around September. > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Andrew] If we want to have a true practice, we need to be > > >> diligently > > >>> following Apache guidelines. > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Max] We might want to revive the email thread about how we > should > > >> do > > >>> this. > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Chris] It would be great for someone who hasn’t done this before > > to > > >>> do this. > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Andrew] Building a script for this is smart otherwise the manual > > >>> work is painful from experience. > > >>> > > >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JCLOUDS/Releasing+jclouds > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JCLOUDS/ > Validate+a+Release > > >>> > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> *Action Item* [Max] Max will own this. This will happen by 08/19. > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Arthur] For the main release around mid September. We need to > > >>> confirm this date. > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> Roadmap > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Max] Maybe each company puts their own section? Or should we > have > > a > > >>> more cohesive roadmap? > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> *Action Item* Gurer to schedule a roadmap discussion > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> Misc > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Max] For executor thinking about sticking with Celery and maybe > > >>> having Docker implemented on top of it. > > >>> - > > >>> > > >>> [Max] We might want to explore Sphinx for generating > documentation > > >>> from code. > > >>> - [Max] Please review the impersonation design review. This is > > >> pretty > > >>> simple and reversible. > > >> > > >> > > > > >
