All, Here is the signup sheet that you can use. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/Contributor+Meetings?flashId=-254062785
Sid, I think the nature of the roadmap meeting is different than the sync up. We might want to have one roadmap meeting each quarter and sync up meetings at a more frequent cadence. For the onsite, it obviously is optional. We thought it would actually be a nice thing to host and do not have a hidden agenda. Gurer On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 10:36 AM, siddharth anand <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Gurer, > I can see it as more efficient since you folks are hosting an onsite event > that includes lunch. If folks are expected to make a physical appearance, > then it makes sense to make the event longer to offset commute costs (in > terms of time). As mentioned above, I think that might be a little > heavy-weight for a roadmap sync up -- I feel regular 1 hour sync-ups every > 2 weeks are a better use of everyone's time and can do for more keeping > folks engaged. > > Also, I hope you are not considering this as a recruiting event -- that > won't be kosher. > > A better means to meet/greet and recruit are actually at our community > meet-ups, of which we have one scheduled for tomorrow : > http://www.meetup.com/Bay-Area-Apache-Airflow-Incubating-Meetup/ > > -s > > On Tue, Sep 20, 2016 at 9:42 AM, Gurer Kiratli < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Sid, > > > > Thanks for your feedback. I think creating a signup page is a great > idea. I > > will do that and share and as you said we can collect feedback through > > there. > > > > For the 2 hours, as I put in the agenda the first hour is to catch up and > > the second hour is to discuss about the roadmap and future of Airflow. We > > can separate these out but I thought it would be more efficient this way. > > > > For the onsite part, I think it has pros and cons. The particular > > conference room > > <https://www.wired.com/2013/12/airbnb-gets-stylish-new-headquarters/> I > > booked at Airbnb is I think pretty good in terms of mics and the cameras > > focus to the person speaking. Of course you don't get to see the persons > > name below but we can have name tags to mitigate that. And being onsite > has > > the advantages of having some face time and it is optional. If the > > community feels strongly we can move to a Webex-only format. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Gurer > > > > On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 9:27 AM, siddharth anand <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Gurer, > > > Thanks for setting this up. 2 hours might be a bit long for locals to > > spend > > > at this meeting since it occurs during normal work hours. Any reason > > > holding more frequent 1 hour meetings won't work? > > > > > > Also, thanks for setting up a webex meeting. If you'd like to get a > sense > > > of who plan to attend, I suggest creating a sign up page for this > meeting > > > on https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/ with columns > for > > > name, > > > email address, timezone, attending (Yes/No), attending via WebEx > > (Yes/No), > > > Reason for attending/not-attending, etc.... For example, I will attend > > via > > > WebEx although I am in the local TZ. I suggest people recording if they > > are > > > not attending and the reason for not attending as well if the reason is > > > time so we can get a sense of developer community geo distribution. > > > > > > Also, we need to ensure the meeting can effectively involve both remote > > and > > > local. That means having a conference room with enough mics in the room > > to > > > capture all of the conversations that can occur. In my experience, > > > Zoom/Webex/Google > > > Hangout/<pick your teleconferencing software> works better than having > a > > > bunch of folks in a room as each speaker gets a his/her own > > > identity-labeled video/audio feed. In the > > > group-shares-physical-conference-room-with-remote-attendees scenario, > > it's > > > often hard for remote attendees to know who's speaking. That's > especially > > > difficult with a lot of new faces. > > > > > > -s > > > > > > On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 2:13 PM, Li Xuan Ji <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > I'll try to join the webex link. > > > > > > > > On 16 September 2016 at 18:52, Gurer Kiratli > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > Again it has been a while after our last meeting. Let's have > another > > > > > meeting to sync up! > > > > > > > > > > We are super happy to host all you folks at Airbnb(888 Brannan St > > > > > 94103) on *October > > > > > 7th at 10:00am.* Also we will have a webex session at > > > > > https://airbnb.webex.com/meet/gurer.kiratli. > > > > > > > > > > I will send this out as a Google Calendar but due to the fact that > it > > > > goes > > > > > thru the mail group I don't see your responses. If you are planning > > to > > > > come > > > > > on please respond back to me with your first name, last name. And > > > please > > > > > try to arrive by 9:30 so we can check you and head to the meeting > > room. > > > > : ) > > > > > > > > > > Here is the proposed agenda: > > > > > > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > 10:00am -10:45am PDT > > > > > - Contributors sync-up: progress and plan > > > > > - Release Schedule, Management > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > 10:45am - 11:00am PDT > > > > > - Coffee Break > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > 11:00am - 12:00pm PDT > > > > > - Roadmap discussion > > > > > - > > > > > > > > > > 12:00pm - 1:00pm PDT > > > > > - Lunch @ Airbnb > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > > > Gurer > > > > > > > > > >
