Thanks for the feedback Max, and the pointer to the line of code.  I'll
take a look and make a PR to discuss further.

cheers,
Dennis


On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 10:49 AM Maxime Beauchemin <
[email protected]> wrote:

> It's a totally reasonable use case. As you said, currently it only moves
> forward, though it could also move backwards. You could add a DAG argument
> `schedule_past_dagruns=False` (we probably need a better name), that would
> enable this feature.
>
> Here's the code that creates DagRuns, it seems like it may be easy to add a
> few lines to implement this feature.
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-airflow/blob/master/airflow/jobs.py#L761
>
> Max
>
> On Mon, Apr 2, 2018 at 7:17 PM, David Capwell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > Nothing I know of.  The scheduler finds the latest execution then creates
> > the next based off interval; this is also why update to start date have
> no
> > affect (doesn't try to fill gaps)
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 2, 2018, 11:26 AM Dennis O'Brien <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi folks,
> > >
> > > I recently asked this question on gitter but didn't get any feedback.
> > >
> > > Anyone know if there is a way to get the scheduler to reverse the order
> > of
> > > the dag runs? By default a new DAG starts at start_date then moves
> > > sequentially forward in time until it is caught up (assuming
> > catchup=True).
> > > The same is true for a new DAG just enabled, or a DAG that is cleared,
> > and
> > > for a backfill.
> > >
> > > The behavior I'd like to get is for the scheduler to queue up the
> latest
> > > available, so it starts most recent, then moves back in time. If while
> > the
> > > backfill is running a more recent DAG run is eligible, that one should
> be
> > > queued next.
> > >
> > > Is there anyway to accomplish this?  Is this a feature that others
> would
> > > find useful?
> > >
> > > For some background, I have some jobs that make predictions and do a
> long
> > > backfill for historical backtesting, and that can mean no new
> predictions
> > > for a week depending on the job and the time to backfill.  Ideally the
> > most
> > > recent jobs would take precedence over the historical jobs.
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > > Dennis
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to