> On Nov 25, 2018, at 5:02 AM, George Leslie-Waksman <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> It's probably a good idea to put something at "airflow", even if it
> just fails to install and tells people to install apache-airflow
> instead.
>
> If not, there's a risk someone squats the name airflow and puts up
> something malicious.
>
+ 1
> --George
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 11:44 AM Driesprong, Fokko <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks Dan for picking this up quickly.
>>
>> Op vr 23 nov. 2018 om 18:31 schreef Kaxil Naik <[email protected]>:
>>
>>> Thanks Dan
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 3:44 PM Dan Davydov <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This could potentially break builds for some users but I feel the pros
>>>> mentioned outweigh this, I went ahead and deleted it.
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 10:18 AM Bolke de Bruin <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Agree! This is even a security issue.
>>>>>
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 23 Nov 2018, at 15:29, Driesprong, Fokko <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think we should remove airflow <https://pypi.org/project/airflow/>
>>>>> (not
>>>>>> apache-airflow) from Pypi. I still get questions from people who
>>>>>> accidentally install Airflow 1.8.0. I see this is maintained
>>>>>> by mistercrunch, artwr, aeon. Anyone any objections?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers, Fokko
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> *Kaxil Naik*
>>> *Big Data Consultant *@ *Data Reply UK*
>>> *Certified *Google Cloud Data Engineer | *Certified* Apache Spark & Neo4j
>>> Developer
>>> *Phone: *+44 (0) 74820 88992
>>> *LinkedIn*: https://www.linkedin.com/in/kaxil
>>>
