Please note that there are multiple sites making the claim that memory
allocation
is in multiples of *yarn.scheduler.minimum-allocation-mb*; this may have
been true
at one time but is no longer true (thanks to Sandesh for fact-checking
this).

There is a (?new?) parameter, *yarn.scheduler.increment-allocation-mb*,
which serves
this purpose as discussed here:
http://blog.cloudera.com/blog/2013/11/migrating-to-mapreduce-2-on-yarn-for-operators/

Ram

On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Pradeep A. Dalvi <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks Chinmay & Ram.
>
> Troubleshooting page sounds the appropriate location. I shall raise PR with
> the given suggestions.
>
> --prad
>
> On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 5:49 AM, Munagala Ramanath <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > There is already a link to a troubleshooting page at bottom of
> > https://apex.apache.org/docs.html
> > That page already has some discussion under the section entitled
> > "Calculating Container Memory"
> > so adding new content there seems like the right thing to do.
> >
> > Ram
> >
> > On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:27 PM, Chinmay Kolhatkar <
> > [email protected]
> > > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Pradeep,
> > >
> > > This is a great content to add to the documents. These are the common
> set
> > > of errors which might get googled and hence great to get indexed as
> well.
> > >
> > > You can take a look at:
> > > https://github.com/apache/apex-core/tree/master/docs
> > >
> > > The docs for apex reside there in markdown format. Probably its good a
> > > create a troubleshooting page where all such common questions can
> reside.
> > >
> > > After you have the content ready, you can create a pull request to
> > > apex-core repo which can get merged to apex-core and later deployed to
> > the
> > > website by committers.
> > >
> > > -Chinmay.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 10:46 AM, Pradeep A. Dalvi <[email protected]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Container & memory resource allocation has been a common question
> around
> > >> and so I thought it would be good to explain related configuration
> > >> parameters.
> > >>
> > >> Please feel free to let me know your thoughts.
> > >>
> > >> Also I'm planning to add following set of information under Apex Docs.
> > How
> > >> could one add this to Apex Docs?
> > >>
> > >> =-=-=-=
> > >>
> > >> "Container is running beyond physical memory limits. Current usage: X
> GB
> > >> of
> > >> Y GB physical memory used; A GB of B GB virtual memory used. Killing
> > >> container."
> > >>
> > >> This is basically for some better understanding on Application
> Master's
> > >> container requests & Resource Manager's memory resource allocation.
> > Please
> > >> note that these are individual container request params. All these
> > >> parameters are in MB i.e. 1024 => 1GB.
> > >>
> > >> - AM's container requests to RM shall contain memory in the multiples
> of
> > >> *yarn.scheduler.minimum-**allocation-mb* & not exceeding
> > >> *yarn.scheduler.maximum-**allocation-mb*
> > >>    - If *yarn.scheduler.minimum-**allocation-mb *is configured as 1024
> > and
> > >> container memory requirement is 1025 ( <= 2048 ), container will be
> > >> allocated with 2048 memory.
> > >>
> > >> - With Apex applications, operator memory can be specified by property
> > >> *dt.application.<APP_NAME>.operator.<OPERATOR_NAME>.attr.MEMORY_MB*
> > >>    - Please note this parameter is at Operator level and container
> > memory
> > >> is calculated based on number of Operators deployed in a container +
> > >> additional memory required depending on physical deployment
> requirements
> > >> e.g. unifier or bufferserver
> > >>    - Wildcard * can be used at APP_NAME and/or OPERATOR_NAME
> > >>
> > >> - If container memory is not specified, then AM would request for 1
> unit
> > >> of
> > >> *yarn.scheduler.minimum-**allocation-mb*, RM would provision container
> > >> taking that into consideration.
> > >>
> > >> Node Manager monitors memory usage of each of these containers and
> kills
> > >> the ones crossing the configured limit.
> > >>
> > >> Almost similar stuff is applicable for CPUs.
> > >>
> > >> --prad
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> >
>

Reply via email to