On 08/27/2015 12:41 AM, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 27.08.2015 06:37, Branko Čibej wrote:
On 27.08.2015 05:46, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Several years ago, we combined the functionality of apr and apr-util,
and that library no longer draws in sub-dependencies until specific
components are necessary (dbm providers, dbd providers, crypto
providers etc).
It seems overtime that we produce a release based on that effort, I'm
offering in absence of other volunteers to prepare an -alpha candidate
in mid-September.
We don't work on the same clock as downstream distributors, so
whatever effort we make in Sept won't see broad distribution until
2016. But if the httpd, svn and other consumers have successfully
integrated with the 2.0 trunk/ development effort, it seems like this
is a good time to begin to make that happen.
Thoughts/comments/roadblocks/showstoppers?
Good move.
There are a few long-outstanding patches from the SVN devs that I'd like
to get into the code first, so mid-September is a good goal.
On that topic, what would it take to take the Windows cmake build off
'experimental' status for 2.0 and remove the .dsp and .mak files?
-- Brane
Check "Known Bugs and Limitations" in README.cmake, especially the
second bullet :( There are a lot of users that aren't affected by that,
but it is a significant problem.
