Upayavira wrote:
So, 2.2 = important, and 3.0 = important. Both.
We need to avoid discussions, implications, emotions, etc that suggest
otherwise.
Right. If any of that has gone on, I'm sure its unintentional. If
memory serves me correctly, Cocoon 2 was written as a branch, and
Maintenance was happening on Cocoon 1 for a while.
There did come a time when work stopped on Cocoon 1, but that was after
Cocoon 2 was released.
Basically, new/exciting stuff should go in Cocoon 3, and touch ups to
Cocoon 2 until Cocoon 3 is ready for prime time.
