-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Mon, 5 Dec 2005, Gianugo Rabellino wrote:

Date: Mon, 5 Dec 2005 18:04:49 +0100
From: Gianugo Rabellino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: JMX integration (was: Re: [RT][long] Cocoon 3.0: the necessary
    mutation)

On 12/5/05, Giacomo Pati <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While we are at it. I actually have the need for some JMX
instrumentation in Cocoon 2.1. But instead of just writing some MBean
wrappers for my components, I'd like to spent some more time on it for a
more general solution to it (monitoring component pool sizes come to my
mind quickly).

Is there any interest do discuss this topic for a possible
implementation?

Most definitely yes. However, be warned that retrofitting JMX to the
current Cocoon architecture seemed like a big headache to me. Maybe
going through Excalibur instrumentation (which I've never been able to
see working) could do, otherwise expect pain. Lots of.

Could you elaborate a bit more? I'm interested about oppiions.

Ciao


Ciao,
--
Gianugo Rabellino
Pro-netics s.r.l. -  http://www.pro-netics.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance: http://www.orixo.com
(blogging at http://www.rabellino.it/blog/)



- -- Giacomo Pati
Otego AG, Switzerland - http://www.otego.com
Orixo, the XML business alliance - http://www.orixo.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDlLLQLNdJvZjjVZARAl/4AKDvP5RbxyQhdi8it32jgqJmuKmTlwCgjPh5
jgepC3MGVAun3IKX5iwzGME=
=lC6K
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to