On Wednesday December 07, 2005 6:26 pm, Thomas Lutz wrote: > Though I am not a dev guy, I can't resist to vote, too. IMHO a mix makes > no sense. Too make a long story short I made struggled my way into > cocoon with
<snip type="everything I was feeling, and I'm not alone in my view"/> > Last comment: Though this is not the question in this poll, I would even > kick out the pipeline xml stuff. XML was not designed to be > "procedural", basically it's a markup language, which focuses on data > exchange. In my vision we can keep our pipelines, but remove most (if not all) of the XML configuration crap. Just some good solid conventions like rails. > > On a recent open source talk in vienna a committer from RoR was joking > about the java frameworks and their tons of configuration and even worse > "flow" description files. Though the RoR approach goes a bit too far for > a compiled language like java, I do believe it makes sense to stick to > the language choosen. Oh yes, spring flow... > > So, please :-), only one language, and as cocoon (or whatever it's name > will be :-) ) is a J2EE framework: _Java_ I hear you, and hopefully even more. > > Sorry for the interference :-), regards, > tom > Please interfere. Users lurking on dev are more than welcome to contribute their oppinions.
