Le 23 déc. 05, à 17:43, Giacomo Pati a écrit :
...Before I'm going to commit the real MBean I have I'd like to discuss whether we want to have a cocoon.sh/cocoon.bat option to start a jetty with a JMX-Agent activated.

My oppinion would be: Yes we should..

+1, this is useful if only to show how to enable JMX support.

...If most people find this is a must I'd further want to discuss whether we should switch to a more recent jetty version (now 4.2.23, I suggest using 5.1.8) which has better configuablility (we can get rid of the Loader class) and the way how JMX is configured is mutch clearer to me...

also +1, I see no reason to stay with an old version of Jetty.

-Bertrand

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature