Josias Thöny wrote: > > Thanks for the fix! > But somehow there still seems to be a problem with "*/" matching more > than it should. > > If I change the URL in the testcase from "foo/bar/" to "test/foo/bar/", > it matches "*/" and the testcase fails. (See attached diff) > > Is this another bug or did I miss something? > Many thanks for the test case!
Yes, it's another bug. I fixed this as well and added your test case. But I think we should switch to Giacomo's code anyway. It looks much better! Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler - Open Source Group, S&N AG http://www.s-und-n.de http://www.osoco.org/weblogs/rael/
