Option to turn off pooling for components (probably faster on new JVMs and 
simpler debugging)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

                 Key: COCOON-2071
                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-2071
             Project: Cocoon
          Issue Type: Test
          Components: - Components: Sitemap
    Affects Versions: 2.2-dev (Current SVN)
            Reporter: Alexander Klimetschek
            Priority: Minor
         Attachments: disable-pooling-config.patch

This is a patch that makes the pooling of components/beans optional: by setting 
this in the applicationContext.xml

  <!-- Activate Avalon Bridge -->
  <avalon:bridge pooling="false"/>

it is possible to turn off pooling completely. The idea is to start testing 
performance differences between pooling and non-pooling. The default value for 
the "pooling" option is true, so existing configurations without the attribute 
set will behave as before when this patch is applied.

Pooling was introduced back then when creating a new object in Java was slow 
and re-using of existing objects was faster. Since Java 1.4 this is no longer 
the case, creating new objects is said to be even faster than malloc() in C. 
Because pooling needs a recycle() method (to reset internal stuff before reuse) 
and more calls, including some AOP and Proxy class stuff to add pooling, it is 
worth to check what is faster nowadays.

One thing that always annoys me during debugging is that the AOP stuff adds 
like 4-5 additional calls when accessing a pooled component in the stacktrace - 
code that you cannot step into, because it has no java source. Removing pooling 
completely would make the Cocoon architecture (especially the runtime 
architecture) much simpler.

My idea is that Cocoon users can test the performance difference on their 
various systems to get actual results. WDYT?

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to