[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12554947
]
Reinhard Poetz commented on COCOON-1831:
----------------------------------------
Thanks for the update on your patch. I had already been wondering how your code
could work correctly with only one getNames() implementation ;-)
I've applied the patch locally and it looks good so far. I will commit it some
time next week. Then I will work on setting up a test infrastructure so that we
can test all this really important code thoroughly.
> Passing parameters to sub calls
> -------------------------------
>
> Key: COCOON-1831
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COCOON-1831
> Project: Cocoon
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Components: - Servlet service framework
> Reporter: Reinhard Poetz
> Assignee: Reinhard Poetz
> Attachments: BlockCallHttpServletRequest.patch,
> cocoon-servlet-service-impl.patch, cocoon-servlet-service-impl.patch
>
>
> When a servlet service request is created, parameters from the parent request
> are ignored. This means that the sub request is performed as a fresh and
> clean new call. This would avoid any possible side-effects, but is very
> inconvenient in practice because you don't even know the request header
> parameters from the original (external) request. Additionally you can only
> pass information which is part of the returned stream, which is e.g. a
> blocker to use the servlet protocol together with the control flow
> implementations. Those make use of special request parameters to transport
> the model ("bizdata") to the view layer.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
