Oh right, the other "PhoneGap killer". I bet that I'm going to have to once again say "It's much more productive to work with an open source project" when I'm asked about these people at a conference.
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 8:00 AM, julio cesar sanchez <[email protected]> wrote: > With this "We are collaborating with another company on this project" I > think they are referring to Ludei's CocoonJS > > El martes, 8 de julio de 2014, Fischer, Paul A <[email protected]> > escribió: > >> I think they are referring to the Crosswalk pluggable webview. They >> currently use Crosswalk as their delivery mechanism for Android and it >> includes an approximately 15 MB payload for the replacement webview. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] <javascript:;> [mailto:[email protected] >> <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Michal Mocny >> >> I'm not concerned about that part Joe. I'm a little concerned about the >> way they worded the second part. It sounds like its something custom they >> are building, that isn't related to cordova at all. I'm assuming it is, >> but talk about questionable writeup (gasp, surprise for Famo.us). >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 12:02 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected] >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> >> > WTF is Adobe Cordova? I know that someone was talking to the Famo.us >> > guys, but they really screwed up this mailout. :S >> > >> > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:59 PM, Michal Mocny <[email protected] >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > > From todays Famo.us email marketting: >> > > >> > > >> > > *Adobe collaboration* >> > > We are proud to announce that we have officially begun a >> > > collaboration project with the Adobe Cordova team to make core >> > > improvements to Cordova itself. Included as part of this project >> > > will be a section of Famo.us University to teach people how to wrap >> Famo.us apps. >> > > >> > > *The Famo.us Wrapper* >> > > The wrapper will enable developers to create a pluggable webview >> > > wrapped inside their Android apps. The good news is that you can >> > > provide a Chrome >> > > 35 webview with this method. The bad news is that it comes with a >> > > 10-20MB payload. We are collaborating with another company on this >> > > project—sorry, but we can't say their name yet. This solution is in >> > > the labs and is not ready for production. We will let you know when >> > > it is available. If you'd like to participate in our beta, please >> contact [email protected] <javascript:;>. >> > >>
