No, I don't think adding crosswalk as an engine would be a good idea due to compatibility. We should make a spec engine that's just a clone of AndroidWebView specifically for testing and API functionality. I'll add that to the JIRA subtask.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for compiling. Do you think git submodules would be worth using to > track this? E.g. add the engine plugins as submodules to 4.0.x? > > > On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Ian Clelland <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Joe and I spent a bit of time last night working out compatible versions of >> cordova-android and cordova-crosswalk-engine. (One of the pains of having >> separate repos for everything is when APIs change, it's a pain to find >> matching versions again) >> >> This is what we found (I went over the commits from the last month or so to >> work out the ranges of compatibility): >> 1. Nothing works with xwalk 8.36.171 or higher. Crosswalk has a new >> embedding API, which I still need to integrate. ( >> https://github.com/clelland/cordova-crosswalk-engine/pull/4) >> >> 2. The latest heads of each branch work together: >> android a99c821 >> engine 8e4eeb2 >> xwalk 8.36.157 >> >> 3. cordova-android from a4f6d9f (July 10) to a99c821 (July 14) can be used >> with the latest version of cordova-crosswalk-engine >> >> 4. cordova-android from efcedab (July 9) up to to fc2a202 (July 10) require >> crosswalk-engine @ b423b1c >> >> 5. cordova-android d66bb84 and 428e1bc (June 24) require crosswalk-engine @ >> 220e9ce (This is June 24, before the big changes) >> >> 6. cordova-android c052f40 (June 20) to 96a119 (June 23) require >> crosswalk-engine @ 714f7b6 >> >> 7. cordova-android 3a9898a (June 18) up to 98246c (June 20) require >> cordova-crosswalk-engine 0b0691f (Crosswalk 8.36.157) or 50f8116 (Crosswalk >> 8.36.156) >> >> Commits to cordova-android between these ranges (i.e, 428e1bc < x < >> efcedab) don't work with any version of cordova-crosswalk-engine. >>
