+1 for --win / --phone, short and intuitive :)
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon) < [email protected]> wrote: > We [Microsoft team] did additional round of switch names for windows > discussion and propose to use '--win' and '--phone'. Please let me know if > it works. I've sent the following PR for review > https://github.com/apache/cordova-windows/pull/39 > > Thx! > Sergey > -----Original Message----- > From: Shazron [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Saturday, August 9, 2014 3:31 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: platform switches for Windows Universal Apps > > The iOS format can be cleaned up (at least for the Simulator) -- but the > parameters to ios-sim depend on the executable itself and we can't change > that without breaking everyone, so we will have to map the params instead > of passing it through. > > --target=iPhone5s will map to "--retina --64bit --family iphone" for > example > > On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 7:48 AM, purplecabbage <[email protected]> > wrote: > > People *must* be exposed to windows terminology. None of your --store > alternative make sense. > > --windows-store might, or maybe --modern-app or --winrt ? > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > >> On Aug 8, 2014, at 6:20 AM, Mark Koudritsky <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> My 2 cents: > >> > >> - I prefer "phone" over "handset" as I don't like those overly dry > >> formal names that got heavily overloaded with years but still give a > false > >> sense of better specificity. > >> - --store is a very counter intuitive name for desktop apps for > someone > >> not exposed to the new Windows terminology. Is it intended to mean > desktop > >> apps? (some alternatives --desktop, --laptop, --fullsize, > --largescreen ?) > >> - --phone vs --type=phone - either seems fine to me and pretty easy to > >> implement. > >> - --target=X is unrelated, it's not for selecting a type of device but > >> for explicitly choosing the device to use if several are connected to > your > >> dev station. >
