Something strange is definitely going on in the file tests; in the vicinity of spec.109. Custom matchers are not being added after that spec, but if I remove it, then the tests simply stop at that point.
On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Ian Clelland <[email protected]> wrote: > No, it appears that something is up with Jasmine on ios -- the custom > matchers aren't being attached in all cases, so I am seeing errors in the > console like: > > TypeError: 'undefined' is not a function (evaluating > 'expect(fileEntry.name).toCanonicallyMatch(fileName)') > > because .toCanonicallyMatch is not present. It's odd, because it is > present in previous tests, so I don't know why it would be failing after a > certain point. > > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:03 AM, Ian Clelland <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I'll check that out; the file changes could be related to my commits >> yesterday >> >> >> On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Edna Y Morales <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I'm seeing many many failing iOS tests. They are seen across file, >>> file-transfer, globalization, geolocation, and media with timeout and >>> reference errors mostly. Can anyone else verify this or is it just me? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Edna Morales >>> >>> [image: Inactive hide details for "Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)" >>> ---08/27/2014 09:39:45 AM---Vladimir Kotikov and me will join this >>> testing]"Sergey >>> Grebnov (Akvelon)" ---08/27/2014 09:39:45 AM---Vladimir Kotikov and me will >>> join this testing party soon and help with the testing and necessary im >>> >>> From: "Sergey Grebnov (Akvelon)" <[email protected]> >>> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> >>> Date: 08/27/2014 09:39 AM >>> Subject: RE: [Testing] No content to speak of >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> >>> >>> Vladimir Kotikov and me will join this testing party soon and help with >>> the testing and necessary improvements(if any). Currently we see some >>> problem with dynamic manual tests generation (at least in Camera tests) on >>> Windows due to special unsafe html restrictions on this platform, Vladimir >>> will send details and workaround. >>> >>> Thx! >>> Sergey >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Martin Gonzalez [mailto:[email protected] >>> <[email protected]>] >>> Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2014 5:12 PM >>> To: [email protected] >>> Subject: Re: [Testing] No content to speak of >>> >>> Agree, over android it looks good, however running the tests over >>> Windows Phone, the final count is 13 new fails. >>> Specs failing: 9, 9.5, 10, 11, 15, 24, 82, 110, 116, 121, 122, 123, 124. >>> >>> >>> >>> 2014-08-26 11:20 GMT-05:00 Marcel Kinard <[email protected]>: >>> >>> > Thanks, Ian! On Android 4.4, I'm now getting no failures with the all >>> > the automatic tests (new-style plugin tests and old-style non-plugin >>> tests). >>> > >>> > Now to start poking at the manual tests... >>> > >>> > On Aug 26, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Ian Clelland <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > > The other issue should be resolved now, but if someone with a WP8 >>> > > device can test it out as well, it'd be appreciated. >>> > >>> > >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> Martin Gonzalez >>> >>> >> >
