+1, merged feature branches should be deleted pinging the relevant committers so they can come rescue anything they want to save would be prudent for the 4. stale/abandoned branches.
On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > Agreed. We should delete feature branches once they're merged in. That > said, we should have a LOT more feature branches. > > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 9:52 AM, Josh Soref <[email protected]> wrote: > > > There are a number of branches in cordova-js. > > I think there should be two kinds of branches: > > > > 1. Release branches (or tags that are created as branches) > > 2. Feature branches > > > > Well, two other kinds of branches: > > 3. Merged feature branches > > 4. Stale/abandoned branches > > > > I'd like to remove things that fall into #3/#4: > > > > Merged: > > * future (bhiggins) > > * pl (filmaj) > > > > Stale/abandoned: > > * playbookFile (timkim) -- note that cordova no longer supports > PlayBook... > > * bb_media_fix (timkim) > > * async_base64_android (agrieve) -- there's no sign of this being merged > > in, and no obvious sign of a bug for it > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > > > >
