I'm pretty sure a lot of the API and gradle changes were important to leave in there, but I still accepted it because I just want to move on. :P
On Tue Feb 03 2015 at 9:55:30 AM Andrew Grieve <[email protected]> wrote: > Did some pruning: https://github.com/cordova/apache-blog-posts/pull/30 > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Michal Mocny <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Its nice when people have a place to look up what changed when they > notice > > a new version is out. (Also, when we do a tools release and updated > pinned > > platforms, we can point back to these posts). Additionally, some of our > > users have come to this list asking for a blog post just recently, so its > > not completely unread.. > > > > On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Joe Bowser <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I don't really like how this is part of the release process at all, and > > the > > > only reason that I'm doing it is because we have to for some reason. I > > > don't really think any of our users actually read this, and I really > just > > > want to see this done so that it can't be used as an excuse to not ship > > > 4.0.x. I think that the blog posts should be completely decoupled from > > the > > > release process, since my desire to see software released is completely > > > different from my desire to further condense release notes that I don't > > > think our users read. > > > On Mon Feb 02 2015 at 2:36:21 PM Josh Soref <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > > > I sent a basic pull request. > > > > > > > > Offhand, that list should probably be shortened a bit more. > > > > > > > > Note that if something didn't change between the current release and > > > > 3.7.0, readers of the release announcement don't care. I can't figure > > out > > > > if some gradle changes were superceeded by others, or relate to > > different > > > > gradle env targets, if they were superceeded, the ones that don't > apply > > > as > > > > of 3.7.0 should of course be dropped. > > > > > > > > Offhand, CB-4914 could probably be dropped; CB-8204 probably should > be > > > > dropped; one instance of CB-8143 should probably be dropped (or not, > if > > > > they're really different things/for different targets). CB-7410 > should > > > > probably be dropped too. > > > > > > > > It's also helpful to group things by area. > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
