Great! This is encouraging. I'll help expedite this as much as I can for it to catch up, I'll look at any PRs and review and merge.
On Tuesday, May 5, 2015, Ondrej Florian <[email protected]> wrote: > If there is any interest, I would volunteer to pick it up. > > The Cordova-osx has its uses (I use it myself). > > One advantage over the Atom Electron is the plugins. > Many non-UI iOS plugins will works with it out of the box. > > Another is that it's just another Cordova platform so you don't have to > work with yet another API. > > However, I think you'll rarely be satisfied with 'pure' cordova-osx > (entire UI done in HTML5/js) - it's way too limiting. > But for a hybrid app where you can mix in the native UI - it works well. > > > Ondrej > > On 05/05/2015 01:56, "Shazron" <[email protected] <javascript:;>> wrote: > > >There is non-trivial work to create a bridge for plugins to work with > >Electron, but it definitely has more of a future than cordova-osx. > > > >On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:48 PM, Shazron <[email protected] <javascript:;>> > wrote: > >> A platform based off Atom Electron is more viable than cordova-osx at > >> this point: http://electron.atom.io > >> > >> On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 4:47 PM, Shazron <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CB-7143 > >>> > >>> Currently there are no resources to work on this, effectively it is > >>> abandoned. Not sure what we do with this platform to signal this > >>> abandonment except for docs. > >>> > >>> If anyone disagrees with mothballing this, chime in. > > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- > >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] <javascript:;> > >For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > <javascript:;> > > > >
