On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 12:05 AM, Garren Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks Paul,
>
> For Fauxton we just need everything that is in src/Fauxton.
>
> Cheers
> Garren
>
> On 18 Jan 2014, at 3:10 AM, Paul Davis <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I've spent most of the day initializing all of our new repositories
>> with the source code for each Erlang application. I've taken special
>> care to make sure that we're retaining as much history as possible.
>> I'm pretty sure that most apps are correct but we'll want to do some
>> auditing in the future before we flip the switch in the future.
>>
>> The code versions are generally speaking either what's on master or on
>> the 1843-feature-bigcouch branch. A few of them I pulled out of the
>> 1994-merge-rcouch branch or from their respective external
>> repositories in the case of ibrowse, mochiweb, and jiffy.
>>
>> Its important to note that all code was imported using a branch named
>> "import" so that we can spend time reviewing code and possibly
>> rewriting history before we commit to what the initial value for each
>> repo should be. If you clone any of these repos git will be a bit
>> confused until you switch to that branch.
>>
>> The couchdb-couch repo is actually a combination of what's on
>> 1843-feature-bigcouch but is rebased against the current master so it
>> should be all the things from both of those. I haven't investigated
>> how much 1994-merge-rcouch has changed actual underlying code as
>> opposed to just moved source code around so we'll have to coordinate
>> there.
>>
>> We'll get the 1843-feature-bigcouch branch updated in the near future
>> to start pulling each of these repositories directly so that people
>> can see how that works in practice.
>>
>> Also of note there are currently three repos that are still empty. The
>> couchdb-couch-collate.git, couchdb-fauxton.git, and
>> couchdb-documentation.git are all uninitialized. For fauxton and
>> documentation I want to hear from people that are more involved with
>> what they'd want in there. I'm not familiar enough to be confident
>> that I've not screwed anything up for either of those. I didn't need
>> couch-collate but I'll get to that soonish.
>>
>> The other thing to point out is that Adam created a ticket in the
>> middle of the email storm that people may want to chime in on to
>> discuss the new commit email subject lines:
>>
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-2032
>

Cool. I'll pull this out when I get back into my git gymnastics routine.

Reply via email to