On Jan 22, 2014, at 6:47 AM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: > My first comment is: if we want more reviews, let's have more committers. > > We double our committer base in 2013, and the results look like this: > > https://www.ohloh.net/p/couchdb/analyses/latest/languages_summary > > And I see comments like this on StackOverflow: > > "I've recently noticed that Couch DB is back in heavy development." > > So I think we should continue to aggressively recruit more committers > to the project in 2014. Excelsior! > > However, as for the way we do reviews... > > Infra ticket about Gerrit > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-2205 > > Effort seems to be mothballed. But I'm sure we could restart it if we > were serious. > > However, we could use this: > > https://reviews.apache.org/groups/hive/ > > It is well integrated with Apache infrastructure already, sends mails > to the mailing list, and so on. > > Happy to request an instance and we can experiment with it if we like. > If it doesn't work out, we stop using it. No harm. Could make it > entirely voluntary until we figure out a workflow that we all like. > > Should I do that?
+1 to going with the flow at Apache on this one, and making it entirely voluntary at first. Adam
