Hi Andy,

Thats a great idea, look forward to the guidelines because I could use the help.

Cheers
Garren

On 24 Jan 2014, at 10:26 AM, Andy Wenk <[email protected]> wrote:

> Garren,
> 
> On 24 January 2014 08:45, Garren Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> It is good to have these discussions, my only concern is that we scare off 
> people that are worried about sending a message to the mailing lists and 
> getting it wrong. There was an email earlier today where that happened to 
> some degree. I'm all for some helpful guidelines but we don't want to end up 
> coming across as those people that complain about what way a message is sent.
> 
> scaring people is a no-no-go. That was definitely not the intention of the 
> discussion. So, I would like to write a summary to all lists with some easy 
> to understand and helpful guidelines. I think they should be really 
> liberal-minded. Unfortunately I will not make that happen today but can make 
> it tomorrow. If anyone else wants to take this part just go ahead ...
> 
> Thanks a lot for pointing this out!
> 
> Cheers
> 
> Andy
>  
> On 23 Jan 2014, at 9:27 PM, Jens Alfke <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >
> > On Jan 23, 2014, at 1:03 AM, Benoit Chesneau <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Just following http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc1855 is good.
> >
> > Etiquette changes over time, and this RFC is nearly 20 years old. 
> > Complaining about top-posting is very "Get off my lawn, kids!"
> >
> > I try to inline-post, except if I'm composing on a phone. But I don't much 
> > mind what style people use, as long as they don't quote the entire message 
> > and then add a line somewhere in the middle of it.
> >
> >>     Since NetNews, especially, is proliferated by distributing the
> >>     postings from one host to another, it is possible to see a
> >>     response to a message before seeing the original.  Giving context
> >>     helps everyone.
> >
> > Technology changes too. I remember the days of UUCP-based Netnews, but it 
> > hasn't been that way in ages. Out-of-order receipt is no longer an issue, 
> > and nearly all mail clients show threads, so it's not hard to see the 
> > context of a reply.
> >
> >> But do not include the entire original!
> >
> > I can't help noticing you included Andy's entire original, Benoit :)
> >
> > —Jens
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> Andy Wenk
> Hamburg - Germany
> RockIt!
> 
> http://www.couchdb-buch.de
> http://www.pg-praxisbuch.de
> 
> GPG fingerprint: C044 8322 9E12 1483 4FEC  9452 B65D 6BE3 9ED3 9588
> 
> https://people.apache.org/keys/committer/andywenk.asc

Reply via email to