+1 I agree on both two points.
Pierre-Arnaud On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 12:08 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > Felix Knecht wrote: > >> Emmanuel Lecharny schrieb: >> >> >>> I would like to start a new thread, because this is an important matter. >>> >>> The question is : do we have to vote every release ? >>> >>> There are pos and cons. >>> >>> pros : >>> - people will be more aware about changes done in a specific part >>> - deploying the jar into maven when a vote has passed is a guarantee >>> that the released jar is endorsed by us >>> >>> cons : >>> - as we have now around 7 projects/sub-projects, plus a couple of >>> plugins (actually, 3, AFAIK), this might transform this PMC to a vote >>> machine ;) >>> >>> >> Hehe 'Release early, release often' :-) >> >> >>> - as many of those subprojects are bound to a bigger project, this >>> would be overkilling >>> >>> Thsoe pros/cons are just the few things which comes to my mind, so >>> feel free to discuss this further, then we may take a decision. >>> >>> ATM, I think that we just need to vote for Server, Studio, and shared. >>> I would like to get your opinion. >>> >>> >> If we do so, we should state this somewhere in our documentation. >> >> > Absolutely ! > > Doing so we should also state that when one of the projects mentioned >> above is released all projectes only based on this one is released as >> well -> >> - shared >> - server (includes implicitly daemon, installer) >> - studio (includes implicitly studio-plugin) >> >> > yep. > > > > -- > -- > cordialement, regards, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > directory.apache.org > > >
