[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12674141#action_12674141
]
Pierre-Arnaud Marcelot commented on DIRSTUDIO-387:
--------------------------------------------------
About, the ServerXmlIOV* classes, you're completely right.
I very like the idea you're proposing.
What about the ServerConfiguration* classes?
Are we keeping them but mapping the access methods to be searching an internal
DOM tree stored in them (replacing the existing internal structure)?
Did I get this right?
Thanks
> Comments are removed!
> ---------------------
>
> Key: DIRSTUDIO-387
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRSTUDIO-387
> Project: Directory Studio
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: studio-apacheds-configuration
> Affects Versions: 1.2.0
> Environment: Windows XP SP1.3 w/JRE 1.5_16
> Reporter: Roger (Skip) Dooley
>
> Lets say your are editing a copy of a source file with your new fancy contest
> sensitive editor.
> Everything looks great, you make some changes save the file, and later look
> at the file with a text editor. Much to your surprise all the comments you
> worked so hard to put in have been stripped by the editor!
> Well that is what happens in Directory Studio's configuration editor.
> The default server.xml file that comes with Dierctory Server has comments in
> it
> After editing with Directory Studio's configuration editor, they are gone.
> You wouldn't accept this behaviour with a source file?
> Comments should be passed through.....or maybe an option default YES
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
