Hi Emmanuel, As the RFC4512 uses the terms 'AttributeTypeDescription', 'ObjectClassDescription', etc.
I think it'd be better to stick the RFC's naming conventions. My 2 cents, P-A On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Emmanuel Lecharny <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > we have two classes of object for each SchemaObject : > - AttributeType and AttributeTypeDescription > ... > - Normalizer and NormalizerDescription > > The second class is used to hold the OpenLDAP/RFC description for the > manipulated SchemaObject. For the AttributeType, the description looks like > : > > ( 2.5.4.9 NAME ( 'street' 'streetAddress' ) > DESC 'RFC2256: street address of this object' > EQUALITY caseIgnoreMatch > SUBSTR caseIgnoreSubstringsMatch > SYNTAX 1.3.6.1.4.1.1466.115.121.1.15{128} ) > > but for the AttributeType, the description field contains the DESC value : > 'RFC2256: street address of this object' > > I suggest that the second class is renamed AttributeTypeSpecification. > > Thoughts ? > > -- > -- > cordialement, regards, > Emmanuel Lécharny > www.iktek.com > directory.apache.org > > >
