-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
>> Wouldn't it be more consistent when logging an error instead of a >> warning when afterwards an exception is thrown? >> > It's not obvious. Sometime, we throw an exception because it's teh way > to know that something went wrong, but we catch this exception at a > higher level and go on. Typically, this is what we do when searching > elements in the schema. The fact that the element is not present is not > an error, from the server POV, but it is from the user POV. Now, we > generally log a debug in this case because we don't want the server logs > to be swamped with errors due to a user trying to get data which does > not exist. I see, thanks for explanation. I keep it as is. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuOLmAACgkQ2lZVCB08qHE3igCdE3Tkv+omeZ4e3Q60ZW8ODD9r Y10An0lT0XIhyOi5/1XuhcR3heZLRD/g =Tn/4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
