Hi guys, First of all thanx Stefan and Stefan ;-) for the quick yet informative feedback. And thanks Lecharny and Marcelot for the support and ideas for coming up with the proposal.
On 8 March 2010 19:40, Stefan Zoerner <[email protected]> wrote: > Although you mention "debug purposes" in your Synopsis, I would emphasize > this aspect a little bit more. It makes clear why there is real value for > our users. In my next revision of the document, as Zoerner mentioned I will elaborate more on the benefits of the Proxy GUI and specially about the use cases of it as a debugging tool. On 8 March 2010 22:15, Stefan Seelmann <[email protected]> wrote: > - The latest LDAP RFC are 4510-4519. If you want to study RFCs please > check out those. > > - As a design goal I think it would be nice to separate the proxy core > (the part doing the network communication and stores logs) from the GUI > part. This would make it possible to reuse the proxy core for a proxy > service. I don't think that you need to implement a separate service and > a communication protocol to the GUI. Additional such separation makes it > easier to write unit test. > And as Seelmann said, I will refer the new RFCs. +1 for the Proxy Core and GUI separation idea. It will be a good architecture and will make things easy for expansion and testing. I will revise the document illustrating the proposed architecture. Eagerly looking forward for more feedback... Best Regards -- Keheliya Gallaba http://galpotha.wordpress.com http://twitter.com/keheliya
