On Thu, 26 Aug 2021 18:19:09 +0300
Igor Ryzhov <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> +static int
> +kni_ioctl_link(struct net *net, uint32_t ioctl_num,
> + unsigned long ioctl_param)
> +{
> + struct kni_net *knet = net_generic(net, kni_net_id);
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
> + struct kni_dev *dev, *n;
> + struct rte_kni_link_info link_info;
> + struct net_device *netdev;
> +
> + if (_IOC_SIZE(ioctl_num) > sizeof(link_info))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&link_info, (void *)ioctl_param, sizeof(link_info)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + if (strlen(link_info.name) == 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + down_read(&knet->kni_list_lock);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, n, &knet->kni_list_head, list) {
> + if (strncmp(dev->name, link_info.name, RTE_KNI_NAMESIZE) != 0)
> + continue;
> +
> + netdev = dev->net_dev;
> +
> + if (link_info.status) {
> + netif_carrier_on(netdev);
> +
> + dev->speed = link_info.speed;
> + dev->duplex = link_info.duplex;
> + dev->autoneg = link_info.autoneg;
> + } else {
> + netif_carrier_off(netdev);
> + }
> +
> + ret = 0;
> + break;
> + }
> + up_read(&knet->kni_list_lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
You need to be using the RTNL mutex in KNI here (and probably elsewhere).
The use of semaphore for list lock should also be replaced by a mutex.
The KNI driver was written long ago and was never reviewed by people
knowledgeable about kernel networking. That is one reason IMHO KNI
should not be used in production systems.
