On Tue, 2022-03-29 at 11:48 +0000, Jiang, YuX wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] <[email protected]> > > Sent: Friday, March 18, 2022 11:21 PM > > To: [email protected] > > Cc: [email protected]; Abhishek Marathe > > <[email protected]>; > > Ali Alnubani <[email protected]>; Walker, Benjamin > > <[email protected]>; David Christensen > > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > > Hemant > > Agrawal <[email protected]>; Stokes, Ian > > <[email protected]>; > > Jerin Jacob <[email protected]>; Mcnamara, John > > <[email protected]>; Ju-Hyoung Lee <[email protected]>; > > Kevin Traynor <[email protected]>; Luca Boccassi > > <[email protected]>; > > Pei Zhang <[email protected]>; Xu, Qian Q <[email protected]>; > > Raslan Darawsheh <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon > > <[email protected]>; Peng, Yuan <[email protected]>; Chen, > > Zhaoyan <[email protected]> > > Subject: 20.11.5 patches review and test > > > > Hi all, > > > > Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 20.11.5. > > > > The planned date for the final release is the 4th of April. > > > > Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and > > report any > > issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release > > the fixes and > > reported validations will be added to the release notes. > > > > A release candidate tarball can be found at: > > > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v20.11.5-rc1 > > > > These patches are located at branch 20.11 of dpdk-stable repo: > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ > > > > Thanks. > > > > Luca Boccassi > > > > --- > Hi Luca, > > Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk20.11.5-rc1 test > rate is 90%. Till now, no critical issue is found. > # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing > * Build&CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with latest > GCC/Clang/ICC version and the popular OS revision such as > Ubuntu20.04, Fedora35, RHEL8.4, etc. > - All test done. One bug https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=982, > no fix yet. > * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including > RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. > - Execution rate is 90%. No new issue is found. > * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including VF- > RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, > etc. > - Execution rate is 90%. No new issue is found. > * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package > Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible > Descriptor, etc. > - Execution rate is 90%. No new issue is found. > * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including > PF/VF single core performance test, RFC2544 Zero packet loss > performance test, etc. > - All test done. No big performance drop. > * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic > test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc. > - All test passed. > > # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing > * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as > PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf > testing/VMAWARE ESXI 7.0u3, etc. > - All test done. Find 5 cbdma related defects, Intel dev is > investigating them. > * Cryptodev: > *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API > testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc. > - All test passed. > *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput Performance > /Cryptodev Latency, etc. > - All test done. > > > Best regards, > Yu Jiang
Thank you - the fix for https://bugs.dpdk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=982 is very simple and waiting for review. -- Kind regards, Luca Boccassi
