On Fri, 2022-07-29 at 11:26 +0000, Jiang, YuX wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jiang, YuX > > Sent: Friday, July 29, 2022 11:01 AM > > To: Luca Boccassi <[email protected]>; [email protected] > > Cc: [email protected]; Abhishek Marathe > > <[email protected]>; > > Ali Alnubani <[email protected]>; Walker, Benjamin > > <[email protected]>; David Christensen > > <[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal <[email protected]>; > > Stokes, Ian <[email protected]>; Jerin Jacob > > <[email protected]>; > > Mcnamara, John <[email protected]>; Ju-Hyoung Lee > > <[email protected]>; Kevin Traynor <[email protected]>; Pei > > Zhang > > <[email protected]>; Xu, Qian Q <[email protected]>; Raslan > > Darawsheh <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon > > <[email protected]>; Peng, Yuan <[email protected]>; Chen, > > Zhaoyan <[email protected]>; [email protected] > > Subject: RE: 21.11.2 patches review and test > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Luca Boccassi <[email protected]> > > > Sent: Thursday, July 28, 2022 8:34 PM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Cc: [email protected]; Abhishek Marathe > > <[email protected]>; > > > Ali Alnubani <[email protected]>; Walker, Benjamin > > > <[email protected]>; David Christensen > > > <[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal > > > <[email protected]>; > > > Stokes, Ian <[email protected]>; Jerin Jacob < > > > [email protected]>; > > > Mcnamara, John <[email protected]>; Ju-Hyoung Lee > > > <[email protected]>; Kevin Traynor <[email protected]>; Pei > > Zhang > > > <[email protected]>; Xu, Qian Q <[email protected]>; Raslan > > > Darawsheh <[email protected]>; Thomas Monjalon > > <[email protected]>; > > > Peng, Yuan <[email protected]>; Chen, Zhaoyan > > > <[email protected]>; [email protected] > > > Subject: Re: 21.11.2 patches review and test > > > > > > On Mon, 2022-07-18 at 10:58 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 21.11.2. > > > > > > > > The planned date for the final release is August 29th. > > > > > > > > Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and > > > > report > > > > any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final > > > > release the fixes and reported validations will be added to the > > > > release > > notes. > > > > > > > > A release candidate tarball can be found at: > > > > > > > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v21.11.2-rc1 > > > > > > > > These patches are located at branch 21.11 of dpdk-stable repo: > > > > https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ > > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > Luca Boccassi > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > Any update from any of the validation teams? Any indication on > > > how the > > > tests are going? > > > > > > -- > > > Kind regards, > > > Luca Boccassi > > > > Everything is fine, find one vhost related issue which is > > investigated by Intel > > Dev. > > I will send a v1 report later. Thanks. > > > > Best regards, > > Yu Jiang > > Update the test status for Intel part. Till now dpdk21.11.2-rc1 test > rate is 90%, no critical issue is found. > Failure defects as below: > Bug1: [dpdk v21.11.2-rc1] examples/performance-thread meson build > error with gcc12.1 on fedora36 > Bug2: DPDK 21.11.1 cryptodev_qat_raw_api_autotest failing > - Intel Dev send a patch to skip oop test for raw api, need > be reviewed and merged.
Hi, Do you have a reference to this patch? I did not see anything new sent to stable in the past week or so > Bug3: [21.11LTS]Test with the new local patch, Vhost-user meet > Segmentation fault issue when quit virtio-user before stopping > sending packets > - Intel Dev is under investigating. > > # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing > * Build&CFLAG compile: cover the build test combination with latest > GCC/Clang version and the popular OS revision such as > Ubuntu20.04&22.04, Fedora36, RHEL8.4, etc. > - All test done. Find one new defect as Bug1. > * PF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including > RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, etc. > - Test rate is 90%. No new dpdk issue is found. > * VF(i40e, ixgbe): test scenarios including VF- > RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/VLAN/VXLAN, > etc. > - Test rate is 90%. No new dpdk issue is found. > * PF/VF(ice): test scenarios including Switch features/Package > Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible > Descriptor, etc. > - All test done. No new dpdk issue is found. > * Intel NIC single core/NIC performance: test scenarios including > PF/VF single core performance test, etc. > - All test done. No big performance drop. > * IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic > test - QAT&SW/FIB library, etc. > - All test passed. > * Power: test scenarios including bi-direction/Telemetry/Empty Poll > Lib/Priority Base Frequency, etc. > - All test passed. > > # Basic cryptodev and virtio testing > * Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as > PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf > testing/VMAWARE ESXI 7.0u3, etc. > - All test done. Find one new issue, Intel Dev is under > investigating. > - Bug Summary:[21.11LTS]Test with the new local patch, Vhost- > user meet Segmentation fault issue when quiting virtio-user before > stopping sending packets > * Cryptodev: > *Function test: test scenarios including Cryptodev API > testing/CompressDev ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc. > - All test done. Only one defect as the above. > *Performance test: test scenarios including Thoughput Performance > /Cryptodev Latency, etc. > - All test done, no perf drop. > > Best regards, > Yu Jiang
