Sure, I'll take a look and fix them in the next version. Thanks, Cheng
> -----Original Message----- > From: David Marchand <[email protected]> > Sent: Friday, October 21, 2022 9:29 PM > To: Jiang, Cheng1 <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Richardson, Bruce > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; > [email protected]; Hu, Jiayu <[email protected]>; Ding, Xuan > <[email protected]>; Ma, WenwuX <[email protected]>; Wang, > YuanX <[email protected]>; Yang, YvonneX > <[email protected]>; He, Xingguang <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [RFC v3] app/dma-perf: introduce dma-perf application > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2022 at 9:22 AM Cheng Jiang <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > There are many high-performance DMA devices supported in DPDK now, > and > > these DMA devices can also be integrated into other modules of DPDK as > > accelerators, such as Vhost. Before integrating DMA into applications, > > developers need to know the performance of these DMA devices in > > various scenarios and the performance of CPUs in the same scenario, > > such as different buffer lengths. Only in this way can we know the > > target performance of the application accelerated by using them. This > > patch introduces a high-performance testing tool, which supports > > comparing the performance of CPU and DMA in different scenarios > > automatically with a pre-set config file. Memory Copy performance test are > supported for now. > > > > Signed-off-by: Cheng Jiang <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Jiayu Hu <[email protected]> > > Signed-off-by: Yuan Wang <[email protected]> > > Acked-by: Morten Brørup <[email protected]> > > --- > > v3: improved nr_buf calculation and added support for getting > > subprocess exit status > > v2: fixed some CI issues. > > There is still at least one build issue. > > > -- > David Marchand
