On 14/08/2025 07:01, Xu, HailinX wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Kevin Traynor <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Friday, July 25, 2025 12:15 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Cc: [email protected]; Abhishek Marathe <[email protected]>;
>> Ali Alnubani <[email protected]>; David Christensen
>> <[email protected]>; Hemant Agrawal <[email protected]>;
>> Jerin Jacob <[email protected]>; Mcnamara, John
>> <[email protected]>; Ju-Hyoung Lee <[email protected]>; Kevin
>> Traynor <[email protected]>; Luca Boccassi <[email protected]>; Pei
>> Zhang <[email protected]>; Raslan Darawsheh <[email protected]>;
>> Thomas Monjalon <[email protected]>; [email protected]
>> Subject: 24.11.3 patches review and test
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Here is a list of patches targeted for stable release 24.11.3.
>>
>> The planned date for the final release is 12th August 2025.
>>
>> Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report any
>> issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release the fixes 
>> and
>> reported validations will be added to the release notes.
>>
>> A release candidate tarball can be found at:
>>
>>     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/tag/?id=v24.11.3-rc1
>>
>> These patches are located at branch 24.11 of dpdk-stable repo:
>>     https://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> Kevin
>>
>> ---
> Update the test status for Intel part. dpdk24.11.3-rc1 all validation test 
> done. no new issue is found.
> 

Hi Hailin,

Thanks for the report.

> known issues: fix patch has been merged into main, but they not merged 24.11 
> LTS, so this issue still exists in 24.11.3-rc1
>   1. Bug 1606 - flow_filtering/flow_filtering_mismatch_rule: Some mismatch 
> rule packets match the rule.
>      - has fix patch: 
> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/patch/[email protected]/
> 

This patch is in since 24.11.2 [0]. Anyway, it is example code and not
critical so don't need to delay the release for it. We can investigate
more for 24.11.4.

thanks,
Kevin.

[0]
https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/commit/?id=b540e51a864d25b1e254fa8c311b92223e0f4162

> * Build & CFLAG compile: cover the build test with latest GCC/Clang version 
> on the following OS(all passed)
>   - Ubuntu25.04/Ubuntu24.04.2
>   - RHEL9.6/RHEL10
>   - Fedora42
>   - FreeBSD14.2
>   - SUSE15.6
>   - OpenAnolis8.10
>   - AzureLinux3.0
> 
> * Function tests: All test done and there are two known issues.
>   - i40E-(XXV710, X722) PF/VF: test scenarios including 
> basic/RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/mac_filter/VLAN/VXLAN/RSS, 
> etc. 
>   - IXGBE-(82599, E610) PF/VF: test scenarios including 
> basic/RTE_FLOW/TSO/Jumboframe/checksum offload/mac_filter/VLAN/VXLAN/RSS, 
> etc. 
>   - ICE-(E810, E830, E2100) PF/VF: test scenarios including 
> basic/Switch/Package Management/Flow Director/Advanced Tx/Advanced 
> RSS/ACL/DCF/Flexible Descriptor, etc.
>   - IPsec: test scenarios including ipsec/ipsec-gw/ipsec library basic test - 
> QAT&SW/FIB library, etc.
>   - Virtio: both function and performance test are covered. Such as 
> PVP/Virtio_loopback/virtio-user loopback/virtio-net VM2VM perf 
> testing/VMAWARE ESXI 8.0, etc.
>   - Cryptodev: test scenarios including Cryptodev API testing/CompressDev 
> ISA-L/QAT/ZLIB PMD Testing/FIPS, etc.
>   - DLB: test scenarios including DLB2.0 and DLB2.5
>   - Other: test scenarios including AF_XDP, Power, CBDMA, DSA
> 
> * Performance test: All test done and passed
>   - Thoughput Performance
>   - Cryptodev Latency
>   - PF/VF NIC single core
>   - XXV710/E810 NIC Performance
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Xu, Hailin
> 

Reply via email to