Hamilton Verissimo de Oliveira wrote: > > -----Mensagem original----- > De: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > I think it's true that Maven is slower than Ant, but, > sorry, I would > > never use Maven nor Ant to just compile my code and see if it > > compiles. It's a build system and not a compile system. > > Sorry, dude, but I use ANT to compile and run the tests. Its > easier to do it than setting up a big projects with lof of > depencies and you are just trying to solve a small bug. > Yeah, I understand that. But as I said, in the case of Eclipse Maven can setup the project for you, so you don't have to do anything in Eclipse to setup your project/test cases; you can just compile/run the cases.
> Nevertheless I don't think maven is going to make me commit > suicide if I'd use it this way (I've used it like that > already and despite the delayed start up time, I had lived > peacefully with it) > Yes, and that's ok - it's not the way *I* am working, but of course my way of developing is not "the right way of doing things". Everyone has to find his own way, sure. > What made me vote on Maven was the belief that managing a lot > of nested projects using ant can be extremely difficult. > Yepp. Carsten --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Excalibur Project -- URL: http://excalibur.apache.org/
