Hello, Carsten -----Mensagem original----- De: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <snip/> Well, dude. I can only speak for the proxy subject, I abstain from Pooled Components discussion :-) I've been thinking about having no proxies at all. Proxy is one of the symptoms of Too much magic(tm) and despite the benefits (prevents users from casting, overriding finalize can handle proper release) the perfomance, complexity and no way to proxy a concrete implementation (without interfaces) counts against it. OTOH I'd like to add some Interceptor capabilities to Fortress 2.0, then we have no choice: Proxy is the only way. So, instead of writing it now on stone, can we work on a simple simple container - with no magic at all - and some extended containers which may add this or that capabilities? Better yet, leverage to components handlers this or that capability. Now it's up to you: WDYT ? :-) Cheers, hammett --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Apache Excalibur Project -- URL: http://excalibur.apache.org/
