hammet, >> Thoughts?
What's the goal? Who is supposed to use this container for what? Why would any project choose this new container over any existing one? Regards, Torsten > Hi there, > > Hitting the same button again - sorry! - I'd like to re-open the > discussion > about a container implementation, still based on the old suggestion from > Leo > Sutic, but this time using Java 1.5. > > Rationale: > - Java 5 has nice features that may allow us to code a container different > from anything currently available > - An excalibur container has no relation to Fortress/Phoenix/any other > which > translates in freedom on its implementation, design and functionality > - We don't even have to think about an avalon container, just focus on > Inversion of control and its meaning. An avalon adapter could come > gracefully from a good design > - For those, like myself, that haven't dig into java 5, that would be a > great opportunity :-) > > Thoughts? > > -- > Cheers, > hammett > http://www.castleproject.org/~hammett > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
