Berin Loritsch wrote:
Antonio Gallardo wrote:
Hi Berin,
Please read comments between lines.... :-)
Berin Loritsch wrote:
Sasvata (Shash) Chatterjee wrote:
All,
We briefly brought this topic up, but the discussion around the
release
overwhelmed this topic.
Can we get a bit of feedback on this?
I'd like to see the following removed libraries resurrected into the
deprecated modules directory, so we can bring them up to the latest
Framework/Logkit JARs. Users should have no expectation of ongoing
maintenance, beyond compatibility with the other JARs. But, if
someone
were to contribute patches occasionally, I really don't see much
harm in
adding those in either. I know the goal is to encourage projects to
move to Apache commons or other libraries, but for projects that
haven't
yet, or cannot afford to for some reason, it'd be nice to have this
(similar reason to why we did the Excalibur project in the first
place).
Here's my list:
excalibur-i18n
excalibur-io
excalibur-naming
excalibur-cache
excalibur-configuration
Isn't IO incorporated into Commons IO?
Naming is now in Codehaus--it being Peter D's code and all. There
shouldn't be any need for compatibility changes as I don't even
think it uses framework.
Can you point to the project. I was unable to find it. I will like to
switch it cocoon.
http://spice.codehaus.org/jndikit/apidocs/overview-summary.html
It's part of spice.
I suspected of spice. Thanks for the hint. :-)
Caching is something that was started and never finished or
validated from what I recall. The sole developer on that component
has been unavailable for many moons.
The configuration and i18n modules I can't remember too much about,
however using standard J2SE calls to resource bundles is actually a
bit more reliable.
Can you explain more about it?
Let's put it this way, Cocoon's current caching mechanism is more
mature and maintained. The Caching library was not (to my knowlege)
ever inforporated or tested with anything.
Yep. We never used the excalibur-cache.jar or at least it is not
currently in the cocoon lib repo. ;-) Sorry for not deleting the cache
part in my initial mail. By leaving this part made the mail less clear. :-(
Now which did you want to hear about, i18n or caching?
i18n, please. :-)
Best Regards,
Antonio Gallardo.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
