Leo Simons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Jan 26, 2007, at 10:36 AM, J Aaron Farr wrote: >>>> Well, let's see if we reach agreement, first :) >>>> >>> So, I think: removing "implements Component" from the interface, but >>> leave it/add it to the implementation for compatiblity. >>> >>> Fine with everyone? >> >> I think POJO is a bad term that is readily abused. That said, I've >> never liked the marker interface and wouldn't mind seeing it go. >> We'd need to test everything of course. And if we're going to go >> that far then maybe I'll finally work on making sure all the >> components properly run in OSGi environments too. > > Well, especially if Aaron is gonna do the testing, a very > enthousiastic +1!
I'm not promising how quick it will happen. I'm bouncing all over China right now and my time and internet connection is sporadic. Should settle down by the end of February though (hopefully won't take that long though). -- jaaron --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
