Hi,

I try the O.1.2 version. I will try the new version as soon as possible (I
was looking for the Cursor Tab :-) )

Clement

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Alin Dreghiciu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : vendredi 21 décembre 2007 14:48
> À : [email protected]
> Objet : Re: Felix integration inside Eclipse pages => page
> 
> Did you try 0.1.1 or 0.2.0 SNAPHSOT:
> http://wiki.ops4j.org/confluence/x/FgJN
> 
> Alin
> 
> On Dec 21, 2007 3:13 PM, Clement Escoffier
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I just try it, it is very cool !
> > I add it on the wiki page.
> >
> > Clement
> >
> > > -----Message d'origine-----
> > > De: Alin Dreghiciu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Envoyé: vendredi 21 décembre 2007 10:49
> > > À: [email protected]
> > > Objet: Re: Felix integration inside Eclipse pages => page
> > >
> > > Hi Clement,
> > > Hope you don't mind but may be interesting to know that at ops4j we
> > > developed an Eclipse plugin called Pax Cursor (based on Pax Runner)
> > > that
> > > makes deploying of bundles into Felix (both versions till now and
> the
> > > ones
> > > to come) quite trivial: http://wiki.ops4j.org/confluence/x/0QBN
> > >
> > > Alin
> > >
> > > On Dec 21, 2007 10:48 AM, Clement Escoffier
> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I wrote two pages about the Felix integration inside Eclipse. The
> > > first
> > > > one
> > > > was written one year ago, and was clearly not up to date. It
> > > explained how
> > > > to install the Felix trunk inside Eclipse. After Felix was
> released,
> > > I
> > > > write
> > > > a second page explaining how to integration the Felix release. So
> to
> > > avoid
> > > > this duplicated page, I merge them this morning, and delete the
> > > oldest
> > > > one.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Clement
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > Clement Escoffier
> > > >
> > > > Grenoble University
> > > >
> > > > +33 (0) 4 76 51 40 24
> > > >
> > > > http://clement.plop-plop.net
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >

Reply via email to