On 07/03/2008, Stefano Lenzi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > See comments below.. > > > Richard S. Hall wrote: > > Well, I was wondering about this too, but I think if there is an impact, > > we can just make the impacted subprojects depend on the already released > > version of compendium until they are made compatible with the newest > > version. I think that should work. > > > > -> richard > > > Before updating the current compendium we have to release it as 1.0.1 to > allow people to: > - Use it with JDK 1.3 (FELIX-486) > - Remove static import which require extra bundle on JDK 1.3 (FELIX-488) > > Also, releasing compendium as 1.0.1 is required for releasing felix-1.0.4 > > Finally which version should we use for the compendium matching OSGi R4.1? > I propose from now on to use the following schema: > <osgi-version>-<felix packaging version> > For example: the current 1.0.0 will become 4.0.0-000, the next > compendium release linked to R4 will be released as 4.0.0-001, and > finally the compdium linked to R4.1 will be released as 4.1.0-000
+1 for using <osgi-spec-version>-<felix-maintenance-version> imho it's much clearer to have the OSGi spec version up front Do you agree or should we use 1.2.0 as next stable release for > compendium? (Should I call a vote?) why not, it's the sort of change we should get consensus for NOTE: If you agree with the new release schema we should change the > version schema even for o.a.f:org.osgi.core and o.a.f:org.osgi.foundation > > > > > > Christian van Spaandonk wrote: > >> Hi Stefano, > >> > >> makes sense to me, I created a JIRA issue for this [1]. I would assign > >> it to myself but I am not yet confident I have a clear overview of the > >> impact this may have for other modules... > > > Thank you! I will assign it to me. > > >> > >> friendly, > >> Christian > > Glad to get new commers :) > > Ciao, > Stefano Kismet Lenzi > > -- Cheers, Stuart
