On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 16:50, Richard S. Hall <[email protected]> wrote:
> > <snipped for shortness> > > > I assume you are not equating getting real URLs with innovation, because >>> to >>> me it is just a hack even if/when it becomes standardized. >>> >>> >>> That's very true and I agree to call that a hack. Our disagreement >> comes >> from that fact that I think hacks can be enablers and are not necessarily >> evils. >> > > I would tend to agree if it weren't for the fact that a) we are never > allowed to get rid of the hacks and b) people continue to create > dependencies on the hacks because they're familiar with it. > I don't think we can't get rids of hacks, though I do think we need to provide a similar way to solve the same problem. If the problem exists, I think we should give a solution for it (then the question is wether you consider the problem valid or not obviously and I guess that's where the difference kicks in). If at some point, there's a better way (or standardized way) to do something, I don't feel compelled to maintain that custom hack forever. And I do think the OSGi api is *the* Felix framework public api. > > -> richard > > <snipped for shortness> > -- Cheers, Guillaume Nodet ------------------------ Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ ------------------------ Open Source SOA http://fusesource.com
