On 4.5.2012 г. 20:11 ч., David Jencks wrote: > I'd like to suggest moving scr trunk to java 6. I realize there are people > still using various jdk 1.3 with scr butI think it is getting less and less > plausible to keep trunk at that level. > > -- I don't think there is any plausible way to solve the concurrency problems > without using modern concurrency constructs such as ReentrantLock > > -- I'd like to enhance the scr commands to use regexes to provide more > flexibility with which bundles you are asking about > > -- consistent use of @Override would help find bugs earlier (we had one such > recently) > > To support 1.3 level users we could either keep a branch alive or see if > retrotranslator still works. > > Thoughts? > > thanks > david jencks > > > Maybe we can investigate the possibility to use Java 6 language constructs, but stick with Java 1.3 API. This would allow us to use http://retrotranslator.sourceforge.net/ on the target bundles, which will make them run on older VMs.
-- ------------------------------------------------- Valentin Valchev · Lead Software Engineer ProSyst Labs EOOD 1606 Sofia, Bulgaria · 48 Vladajska Str. Tel. +359 (0)2 952 35 81; Fax +359 (0)2 953 26 17 http://www.prosyst.com · [email protected] ------------------------------------------------- stay in touch with your product. -------------------------------------------------
<<attachment: v_valchev.vcf>>
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
