[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3645?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13449209#comment-13449209
 ] 

Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-3645:
------------------------------------------

Sorry, your refactoring broke functionality around service binding.

This is manifest in a CT test failure: The test declares a DS 1.0 component. DS 
1.0 only allows the Service instance or the ServiceReference as an argument to 
the bind method. The test component, though has a method taking the Service 
plus a Map (service props). The test expects the component to *not* register 
because the bind method is not found.

The implementation (in the BindMethod) also correctly analyzes the situation 
and logs, that an appropriate bind method cannot be found. But later the 
DependencyManager.bind(Map) method just does a BindMethod.invoke and ignores 
the result. Thus the DependencyManager does not pass back the situation of not 
being able to call a missing bind method and thus the component is activated, 
where it shouldn't.

I would assume the DependencyManager.bind(Map) method must record whether the 
bind method can be called or not as it was before:

                    // success is if we have the minimal required number of 
services bound
                    if ( invokeBindMethod( refs[index] ) )
                    {
                        // of course, we have success if the service is bound
                        success = true;
                    }

                
> SCR could not obtain lock in 5000 ms
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-3645
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3645
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Declarative Services (SCR)
>         Environment: linux fc16, bipro, Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment 
> (build 1.6.0_32-b05)
>            Reporter: Pierre De Rop
>            Assignee: David Jencks
>         Attachments: 
> TEST-org.apache.felix.scr.integration.ComponentConcurrencyTest.xml
>
>
> I finally made an integration test and committed it in the trunk.
> This test sounds to reproduce the problem described in 
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg26360.html.
> the test contains the following files:
> src/test/resources/integration_test_component_concurrency.xml
> src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/ComponentConcurrencyTest.java
> src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/concurrency/A.java
> src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/concurrency/B.java
> src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/concurrency/C.java
> src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/concurrency/AFactory.java
> src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/concurrency/CFactory.java
> I also slightly modified 
> src/test/java/org/apache/felix/scr/integration/ComponentTestBase.java
> in order to use the apache log service, and also to declare the new package 
> from org/apache/felix/scr/integration/components/concurrency.
> The test does the following:
> A optionally depends on B (dynamic=true, cardinality=0..N)
> B depends on C
> A is a factory component and is created by the AFactory class, in an infinite 
> loop and in a dedicated thread.
> C is also a factory component and is created/disposed for ever, by the 
> CFactory class.
> the integration test uses the log service in order to track logged errors, 
> and runs 30 seconds.
> If after 30 seconds, some errors are detected, then the test fail.
> It seems that we have many exceptions when the test fail, which I did not 
> reproduced so far. (see many IllegalMonitorState Exceptions).
> The initial exception discussed from the post in the @dev list is also 
> reproduced.
> For example, I attached to this post my 
> target/failsafe-reports/TEST-org.apache.felix.scr.integration.ComponentConcurrencyTest.xml,
>  when the problem takes place.
> Please take a look starting at line 951, as well as at the corresponding 
> dumpstack at line 713, and also the "Locking activity before 
> IllegalMonitorStateException" log, line 887.
> Hope this will help.
> /pierre

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to