Thanks for everyone for the votes and verification. We have collected enough 
valid votes,
so I am closing this vote. I will announce the results in a separate message.




On Thursday, September 25th, 2025 at 13:52, Márton Balassi 
<balassi.mar...@gmail.com> wrote:

> 
> 
> +1 (binding)
> 
> - Verified Helm repo works as expected, points to correct image tag, build,
> version
> - Verified basic examples + checked operator logs everything looks as
> expected
> - Verified hashes, signatures and source release contains no binaries
> - Ran built-in tests, built jars + docker image from source successfully
> 
> Best,
> Marton
> 
> On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 9:58 AM Maximilian Michels m...@apache.org wrote:
> 
> > +1 (binding)
> > 
> > 1. Verified the archives, checksums, and signatures
> > 2. Extracted and inspected the source code for binaries
> > 3. Compiled and tested the source code via mvn install
> > 4. Verified license files / headers
> > 
> > -Max
> > 
> > On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 9:30 AM Gyula Fóra gyula.f...@gmail.com wrote:
> > 
> > > +1 (binding)
> > > 
> > > - Verified source content, checksums, signatures
> > > - Built from source
> > > - Reviewed flink-web PR
> > > - Tested basic functionality locally
> > > 
> > > Cheers
> > > Gyula
> > > 
> > > On Sat, Sep 20, 2025 at 9:29 AM Gabor Somogyi <gabor.g.somo...@gmail.com
> > > 
> > > wrote:
> > > 
> > > > +1 (non-binding)
> > > > 
> > > > - Verified versions in the poms
> > > > - Built from source
> > > > - Verified checksums and signatures
> > > > - Started basic workload
> > > > - Verified NOTICE and LICENSE files
> > > > 
> > > > BR,
> > > > G
> > > > 
> > > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 8:21 AM Mate Czagany czmat...@gmail.com
> > > > wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > Hi,
> > > > > 
> > > > > +1 (non-binding) - thanks for driving this release Ferenc!
> > > > > 
> > > > > - Verified hashes and signatures
> > > > > - Built from source and tests passed
> > > > > - Checked that no binaries are found in the source distributions
> > > > > - Ran a simple stateful job with Flink 2.1 with
> > > > > checkpoints/savepoints
> > > > > and
> > > > > tested FlinkStateSnapshot functionality
> > > > > - Tested structured YAML
> > > > > - Tested upgrade from operator 1.12
> > > > > 
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Mate Czagany
> > > > > 
> > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 5:44 PM Ferenc Csaky
> > > > > <ferenc.cs...@pm.me.invalid
> > > > > 
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Thanks Max for raising this issue!
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I tend to agree with Gyula’s point — since 1.9.0 has already been
> > > > > > out
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > quite
> > > > > > a while, I wouldn’t consider this a release blocker on its own. It
> > > > > > seems
> > > > > > reasonable to postpone the fix to the subsequent release.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > But happy to reconsider if anybody else have a different opinion.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Ferenc
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > On Thursday, September 18th, 2025 at 16:51, Gyula Fóra <
> > > > > > gyula.f...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Thanks Max, it would be nice to hear what Ferenc thinks as he is
> > > > > > > working
> > > > > > > on
> > > > > > > the RCs.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > My recommendation would be to continue with the release
> > > > > > > verification
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > see if we find any issues/bugs that relate to the current
> > > > > > > release.
> > > > > > > If we find other issues then we should create a new RC where we
> > > > > > > include
> > > > > > > this fix too once it is merged.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > If everything else seems to be spotless then I think we can
> > > > > > > safely
> > > > > > > postpone
> > > > > > > this to 1.13.1 or 1.14.0 whichever comes first :)
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Gyula
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 4:18 PM Maximilian Michels
> > > > > > > m...@apache.org
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Hey Gyula,
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Not exactly forever. The bug was first introduced by
> > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-35328 which
> > > > > > > > appears to
> > > > > > > > have landed in the 1.9.0 release.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Still, it is a relatively easy fix. If the community thinks it
> > > > > > > > is
> > > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > worth fixing, we can postpone the fix to the next release.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > Max
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 4:00 PM Gyula Fóra
> > > > > > > > gyula.f...@gmail.com
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Hi Max!
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Not sure if we should cancel the RC for this issue, this has
> > > > > > > > > been
> > > > > > > > > there
> > > > > > > > > forever and the dynamic kafka source generally has a pretty
> > > > > > > > > limited
> > > > > > > > > user
> > > > > > > > > base.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > Cheers
> > > > > > > > > Gyula
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 3:54 PM Maximilian Michels
> > > > > > > > > m...@apache.org
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Thank you so much for creating the release! Unfortunately,
> > > > > > > > > > I've
> > > > > > > > > > just
> > > > > > > > > > found an issue:
> > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-38381
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Hopefully, the new RC isn't too much work.
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > Max
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Sep 18, 2025 at 2:57 PM Ferenc Csaky
> > > > > > > > > > ferenc.cs...@pm.me.invalid
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Hi everyone,
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Please review and vote on the release candidate #1 for
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > version
> > > > > > > > > > > 1.13.0 of Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator,
> > > > > > > > > > > as follows:
> > > > > > > > > > > [ ] +1, Approve the release
> > > > > > > > > > > [ ] -1, Do not approve the release (please provide
> > > > > > > > > > > specific
> > > > > > > > > > > comments)
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Release Overview
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > As an overview, the release consists of the following:
> > > > > > > > > > > a) Kubernetes Operator canonical source distribution
> > > > > > > > > > > (including
> > > > > > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > > > > > Dockerfile), to be deployed to the release repository at
> > > > > > > > > > > dist.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > b) Kubernetes Operator Helm Chart to be deployed to the
> > > > > > > > > > > release
> > > > > > > > > > > repository at dist.apache.org
> > > > > > > > > > > c) Maven artifacts to be deployed to the Maven Central
> > > > > > > > > > > Repository
> > > > > > > > > > > d) Docker image to be pushed to DockerHub
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Staging Areas to Review
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > The staging areas containing the above mentioned
> > > > > > > > > > > artifacts
> > > > > > > > > > > are
> > > > > > > > > > > as
> > > > > > > > > > > follows, for your review:
> > > > > > > > > > > * All artifacts for a,b) can be found in the
> > > > > > > > > > > corresponding
> > > > > > > > > > > dev
> > > > > > > > > > > repository at dist.apache.org [1]
> > > > > > > > > > > * All artifacts for c) can be found at the Apache Nexus
> > > > > > > > > > > Repository
> > > > > > > > > > > [2]
> > > > > > > > > > > * The docker image for d) is staged on github [3]
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > All artifacts are signed with the key 16AE0DDBBB2F380B
> > > > > > > > > > > [4]
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Other links for your review:
> > > > > > > > > > > * JIRA release notes [5]
> > > > > > > > > > > * source code tag "release-1.13.0-rc1" [6]
> > > > > > > > > > > * PR to update the website Downloads page to include
> > > > > > > > > > > Kubernetes
> > > > > > > > > > > Operator
> > > > > > > > > > > links [7]
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Vote Duration
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > The voting time will run for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > > > > > > > It is adopted by majority approval, with at least 3 PMC
> > > > > > > > > > > affirmative
> > > > > > > > > > > votes.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Note on Verification
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > You can follow the basic verification guide here [8].
> > > > > > > > > > > Note that you don't need to verify everything yourself,
> > > > > > > > > > > but
> > > > > > > > > > > please
> > > > > > > > > > > make
> > > > > > > > > > > note of what you have tested together with your +- vote.
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > Ferenc
> > > > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > > > [1]
> > 
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/flink/flink-kubernetes-operator-1.13.0-rc1/
> > 
> > > > > > > > > > > [2]
> > 
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1844/
> > 
> > > > > > > > > > > [3] ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:b40c553
> > > > > > > > > > > [4]
> > > > > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/flink/KEYS
> > > > > > > > > > > [5]
> > 
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12315522&version=12355967
> > 
> > > > > > > > > > > [6]
> > 
> > https://github.com/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator/tree/release-1.13.0-rc1
> > 
> > > > > > > > > > > [7] https://github.com/apache/flink-web/pull/805
> > > > > > > > > > > [8]
> > 
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Verifying+a+Flink+Kubernetes+Operator+Release

Reply via email to