I guess if a writable context is implemented still the approach given above should work. As we will be using the ENCConfigBuilder only to populate the ENC during startup the interfaces can be used to refer to the gbeans representing the deployed artefacts. Whatever we will be writing to context from apps would be done after startup of server and lost at shutdown. So there would not be any problem due to geronimo using interfaces to get the GBean names as what we will be adding at runtime will not be gbeans and we will not use ENCConfigBuilder. Am I right?
Now a new property for jndiname will also be required in the plans for the connectors.
P.S.This property was actually present in the older versions of geronimo but was removed. I also remember david jencks mentioning in the mailing list that he had a working implementation of a context which he removed for some reason.
Thanks
Manu
>
>On 4/26/06, Guillaume Nodet < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>When a JNDI context is created for a given configuration, the interface
>>name is used to determine the name of the gbean that will be mapped to
>>this JNDI reference (and to create a proxy ?).
>>Take a look at o.a.g.naming.ENCConfigBuilder#addResourceRefs.
>>But I guess this is irrelevant if the objects are bound when they are
>>created.
>>
>>Btw, should the global JNDI tree be read-only, or read-write ?
>>IMHO, a read-write global JNDI tree would be very usefull.
>>
>>Cheers,
>>Guillaume Nodet
>>
>>
>>Manu George wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Thanks David.
>>>
>>>Guillaume , Which proxy in the JNDI Tree are you referring where
>>>geronimo requires the main interface name? Are you speaking of
>>>UserTransaction etc? I thought those were standard names that we can
>>>use to access them and will not be provided in DD? Please clarify and
>>>correct me if I am wrong.
>>>
>>>Thanks
>>>Manu
>>>
>>>On 4/25/06, *David Jencks* <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>><mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It's required for corba ejb references.
>>>
>>> david jencks
>>>
>>> On Apr 25, 2006, at 7:34 AM, Manu George wrote:
>>>
>>> > Hi,
>>> > I have a question regarding one of the objects present in
>>> > the current application local JNDI Context. What is the
>>> > HandleDelegate entry for?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks
>>> > Manu
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>
>
>
