Looks like it addresses my gripes with the current confluence pages. Thanks!
I also agree with the other comment that it would be ideal to have separate 1.0 and 1.1 "spaces" -- which is to say, separate documentation sets. Ultimately I think version N should have everything that version N-1 had only updated and with a "what changed" page and covering any new features. Thanks, Aaron On 5/11/06, Hernan Cunico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi All, I just wanted to give you guys a heads up on how the Geronimo's confluence wiki may look like once cwiki.apache.org jumps in production. Available at the following link is just a single page, static draft based on what is in the oven for Geronimo v1.1 documentation. The new confluence wiki will be running a plugin that automatically exports the new content into HTML format so it can be served as static content increasing the performance. Not only that, the HTML exports can be configured using templates so we can select the information we want to display, for example removing the classic "Added by / last edited by" if it turns to be an issue. Three key things to pay special attention from the template used are, obvious banner at the top of the page, user names removed and Apache license disclaimer at the very bottom of each page. http://people.apache.org/~hcunico/cwiki/documentation.html Comments, questions, suggestions are welcomed :) Cheers! Hernan
