On May 24, 2006, at 12:26 PM, Aaron Mulder wrote:
It doesn't bother me if you do it all at once to give us 2562 --
whatever works.
Are you going to apply David Jencks' fix so Geronimo builds again, or
does David or someone else need to do it?
I told David that I would apply his patch. I'll do as you suggest.
Merge all lost commits as 2652. Followed by David Jencks' patch.
--kevan
Thanks,
Aaron
On 5/24/06, Kevan Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This is the most relevant form of communication for OpenEJB activity
at the moment. So...
I'm about to start replaying the openejb commits lost during the
codehaus crash. There's already been a commit to openejb 2.1 (the
repo is now at rc 2651). So, I'm not going to be able to reproduce
the exact rc 2656 that openejb was at prior to the crash. Instead,
we'll end up at 2657. I'm not sure how svn will behave after we catch
up/pass rc 2656. Probably should assume that a fresh co will be
required. I don't know of any other way of proceeding. Any harm has
already been done. If anyone has better ideas, speak soon...
--kevan
