+1
Matt Hogstrom wrote: > I apologize for resending this to the lists. I inadvertantly did not > put [vote] in the subject line so it may not have been apparent. The > remainder of this e-mail is the same content that was distributed last > night. > > Matt Hogstrom wrote: >> Over the past few days the outstanding issues that were raised about >> the first candidate have been addressed. >> >> They were that we were missing the LICENSE.txt as well as Notices from >> the distribution. I added them. Guillaume also pointed out that he >> noted that there should be a Third Party Notices. This was not >> included in the original 1.0 or previous distributions so I did not >> follow it up. Thoughts? >> >> Also, the 1.0 release notes were removed and updated the thread >> started by Hernan. The Wiki has been updated and the wiki was the >> source used to create the RELEASE-NOTES-1.1.txt file you will find in >> the build. >> >> To avoid issues with the version number and the plugins I used rc1 >> which Aaron had added in the plugins for supported versions so I trust >> that works here. >> >> JSisson addressed the problem with not being able to run Geronimo >> under CygWin and Kevan worked with Aaron to address a new deployment >> problem that left partially deployed artifacts in the repository. >> >> I have taken this build and run some performance tests on it and we >> are significantly better in 1.1 than we were in 1.0. We have a lot of >> improvement left for CMP EJBs. It appears that the performance >> improvements in the EJB tier has changed a race condition when running >> under DB2. I'm afraid that the only way to address the problem is to >> add a new feature to TranQL and OEJB that allow for the specification >> of Isolation Levels for individual beans. This is a relatively simple >> change but the build as it stands is specification compliant. I would >> prefer to let this release go forward since CMP 2.1 EJBs are not >> nearly as common as the other J2EE components. I would like to >> address this in 1.1.1 however I don't think we've locked down whether >> that would be allowed or not. The change would affect TranQL and >> OpenEJB so they are really included components so I'd be interested in >> people's feedback. >> >> So please accept a named RC1. Your voting and feedback are for: >> >> Geronimo 1.1 >> DayTrader 1.1 >> Specs 1.1 >> >> The vote will stand for 72 hours. Issues raised will be discussed and >> if we conclude that there is a bug that must be addressed then we will >> mitigate the problem and respin a new rc for a 72 hour vote. >> >> If this is accepted all three of the above components will be released >> simultaneously. >> >> Here are the builds for your review and comment: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1-rc1.tar.gz >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-j2ee-1.1-rc1.zip >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-j2ee-1.1-rc1.tar.gz >> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-romcat-j2ee-1.1-rc1.zip >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.1-rc1.tar.gz >> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-jetty-minimal-1.1-rc1.zip >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.1-rc1.tar.gz >> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/geronimo-tomcat-minimal-1.1-rc1.zip >> >> >> http://people.apache.org/~hogstrom/rc1/daytrader-ear-1.1-rc1.zip >> >> >> Looking forward to your comments and feedback. >> >>
