+1
On 6/12/06, Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
-dain
On Jun 12, 2006, at 12:20 PM, Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> It does need an RTC since there's a lot of changes here.
>
> +1
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> Rick McGuire wrote:
>> Not sure if this really requires an [RTC] or not, but it doesn't
>> hurt. The patch attached to this Jira:
>>
>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-2107
>>
>> Is the initial checkin for the new javamail providers repository.
>> The bulk of this diff is just the javamail-transport module pulled
>> from the 1.2-dead branch. The most significant change is the
>> mail-1.3 module, which builds an "uber-jar" containing the
>> javamail-spec jar and the javamail-provider jar.
>>
>> This reorg is being done in stages. Once this code is in place,
>> the following additional steps need to be made:
>>
>> 1) Remove javamail-transport from the 1.2 build and change the
>> javamail-transport dependencies to be the new javamail-provider jar.
>> 2) Add the javamail 1.4 implementation to the specs tree.
>> 3) Create javamail-provider-14. and mail-1.4 modules in the
>> javamail repository.
>> 4) Create a javamail 1.4 plugin version.
>>
>> Rick
--
Davanum Srinivas : http://wso2.com/blogs/
